"The error is something common to all men, but when he made a mistake, the wise repair the damage he has done and not maintained immutable. The persistence engenders all sorts of evils "
Sophocles, Antigone
would seem, to the objective data from all angles show us the tragic failure of prohibition, the question of whether this is the right way, at least should be extended. However, there are many aspects that seem to indicate that only extend the hysteria and unreason. Our companies are stubbornly insist on not turning back, in a rather enmendalla sostenella tragic and absurd. If the ban has not worked, more prohibition, if the repression has not served, more repression, if prisons are filled, more prisons.
create or not the use of psychoactive substances harmful to humans, that responsible use can bring us pleasure and knowledge or substances that are intrinsically evil, unable to be used with benefits for ordinary humans, seems clear that prohibition is a failed experiment as a control mechanism thereof. After seeing, we must agree that the prohibitionist system, apart from consuming massive amounts of resources that our societies need certainly to more realistic goals, to generate a huge collateral damage as victims of Drugs of enrichment, by way of grant paid by all the international mafias, to subvert the legitimate relations of states over their citizens, is, above all, unable to get what you are seeking as the main stated goal: to stop illegal use of psychoactive substances. What remains then? What alternatives to the current system have? Would the current prohibitionist system waiver to surrender to the inevitable or a clever change of direction which would remove much of the pain and injustice associated with drugs that exist today?
0 comments:
Post a Comment